Industry Action Plans: Difference between revisions

From OnTrackNorthAmerica
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
(105 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Which industrial systems must be redesigned for sustainability? <!--former link--> ==
__TOC__
==== Natural Resources ====
 
* Water
= This Is Where The Work Begins! =
* Air
You have entered the interactive space of Industry Action Plans. When you [[Participation Options|register as a Participating Stakeholder]] you can add your concerns and perspectives to one or more Industry Action Plans (IAP). 
* Land
 
** FTLUS, Freight Transportation Land Use Strategy <!--former link-->
==== '''Industry Action Plans: In Gear, In Development, and Future''' ====
** RE-BAR, Rail Enabled Brownfield Asset Redevelopment<!--former link-->
 
====Transportation====
== '''In Gear''' ==
*Rail
These are the industries where we see the pressing need for progress and have already gotten a jump start on the work. Our first Industry Action Plan is VitalRail.
**[[RE-SEED Industrial Systems Initiative|RE-SEED, Rail Enabled Sustainable Environment and Economic Development]]
* [[VitalRail|VitalRail, a Continental Strategy for Growing Freight Rail Service]]
*Truck
* [[North American Sustainable Forestry Business Plan|RE-FOREST, Rail Enabled Sustainable Forestry and Wood Products]]
*Air
* [[RE-STEM Minerals Industry Action Plan|RE-STEM, Rail-Enabled Sustainable Transportation of Essential Minerals]]
*Ports
 
*Ocean
== '''In Development''' ==
*River Barge
* RE-CARD, Rail Enabled Cement and Aggregates Regional Distribution
*Pipelines
* RE-POWER, Rail Enabled Power Distribution
* RE-GLASS, Rail Enabled Glass Logistics and Sustainable Supply
* FTLUS, Freight Transportation Land Use Strategy
* RE-BAR, Rail Enabled Brownfield Asset Redevelopment
 
== '''Future''' ==
Do you want to suggest and/or even co-lead CAPSI's work in other industries? Although, our initial focus is on rail's contribution to industrial productivity, CAPSI is designed to improve all industries that can benefit from collaborative progress.


==== Agriculture ====
===== Agriculture =====
* Inputs
* Inputs
** Land use
** Land
** Soil
** Soil
** Soil Enhancements
** Water
** Water
** Enhancements
*Processing
*Processing
* Outputs
* Outputs
** Food
** Food
** Energy
** Energy
** Biomass
** Nutrient material
====Forestry====
 
*[[North American Sustainable Forestry Business Plan]]
===== Forestry =====
*[[North American Sustainable Forestry Business Plan|RE-FOREST, Rail Enabled Sustainable Forestry and Wood Products]]
** Wood
** Wood
** Pulp
** Pulp
** Paper
** Paper
==== Mining====
 
===== Mining =====
* Minerals
* Minerals
**[[RE-STEM Industrial Systems Initiative|RE-STEM, Rail Enabled Sustainable Transportation of Essential Minerals]]
**[[RE-STEM Industry Action Plan|RE-STEM, Rail-Enabled Sustainable Transportation of Essential Minerals]]
* Metals
* Metals
* Coal
* Coal
* Oil and Gas
* Oil and Gas
====Manufacturing====
 
===== Manufacturing =====
*Metals
*Metals
*Chemicals
*Chemicals
*Equipment
*Equipment
*Textiles
*Textiles
====Materials====
 
===== Materials =====
*Containers and Packaging
*Containers and Packaging
*Construction Materials
*Construction Materials
Line 53: Line 63:
*Plastics
*Plastics
*Paper
*Paper
====Construction====
 
===== Construction =====
*Factories
*Factories
*Warehouses
*Warehouses
*Powerplants
*Powerplants
*Mechanical and structural components
*Mechanical and structural components
==== Energy ====
 
===== Energy =====
*RE-POWER, Rail Enabled Power Distribution<!--former link-->
*RE-POWER, Rail Enabled Power Distribution<!--former link-->


==== Waste ====
===== Transportation =====
*Rail
**[[VitalRail: A Continental Freight Rail Growth Initiative|VitalRail, Driving a Sustainable Economy]]
*Truck
*Air
*Ports
*Ocean
*River Barge
*Pipelines
 
===== Waste =====
*Industrial
*Industrial
*Commercial
*Commercial
Line 71: Line 93:
* Wood waste
* Wood waste


==What are the design criteria for CAPSI? <!--former link-->==
===== Natural Resources =====
<big>What do stakeholders want to add to the CAPSI Principles?</big>
When deciding how best to streamline an existing industrial system, stakeholders must evaluate all elements within and affected by that system.
* Water
* Air
* Land
** FTLUS, Freight Transportation Land Use Strategy<!--former link-->
** RE-BAR, Rail Enabled Brownfield Asset Redevelopment<!--former link-->


<big>What Goals do stakeholders want to set?</big>
==== '''Setting the Design Criteria for CAPSI''' ====
 
* What do stakeholders want to add to the CAPSI Ethics and Principles?
<big>What Planning Protocols do stakeholders agree on?</big>
* How do you think stakeholders should address CAPSI and Industry Action Plan goals?
 
* What Planning Protocols do stakeholders agree on?
<big>What Outcomes do stakeholders envision?</big>
* What Outcomes do stakeholders envision?
* What outcomes do we want for the environment?
* What outcomes do we want for the environment?
* What outcomes do we want for citizens?
* What outcomes do we want for citizens?
* What outcomes do we want for business owners?
* What outcomes do we want for business?
* What outcomes do we want for investors?
* What outcomes do we want for investors?
* What resources does society need and want to optimize?
* What resources does society need and want to optimize?
* What goods does society need and want to have available?
* What goods does society need and want to have available?
<big>What Measures of progress do stakeholders want to apply?</big>
* What Measures of progress do stakeholders want to apply?
 
==What is the timeline for CAPSI? ==
<big>January 2025 - Selected stakeholder review</big>
 
<big>April 22, 2025 - CAPSI public launch</big>
 
<big>May 2025 - RE-SEED Launch (Rail Enabled Sustainable Environment and Economic Development)</big>
 
<big>April 2026 - Continental Agreement on Principles, Goals, Protocols, and Outcomes</big>
 
<big>April 2027 - All CAPSI Industrial Systems Initiatives in gear</big>
 
==How must planning evolve to support sustainable industrial systems? <!--former link-->==
<big>What advantages will OTNA’s Collaborative Industrial Optimization deliver?</big>


<big>How do we want public-sector economic development to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?</big>
==== '''Reinventing Public-Private Sector Collaboration''' ====
* How do we want planning to support sustainable industrial systems?
* What benefits do stakeholders want [[Collaborative Industrial Optimization]] to deliver?
* How do we want public-sector economic development to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?
* How do we want private-sector commercial activity to align with sustainable industrial systems?
* How do we want land use decisions to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?
* How do we want transportation planning to evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?
* How can academic and commercial research support sustainable industrial systems?
* What factors do we want to include in assessing the full impact of industrial systems?
* How must interactions among public and private sector entities evolve to support systemwide sustainability?


<big>How do we want private-sector commercial activity to align with sustainable industrial systems?</big>
==== '''Reconceiving Capital Deployment''' ====
* How do we want capital deployment to support sustainable industrial systems?
* How do we want investors’ decisions on capital deployment to evolve?
* How do we want business stakeholders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
* How do we want lenders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
* How do we want public agencies’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
* What advantages will Sustainable Systems Capitalization deliver?


<big>How do we want land use decisions to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?</big>
==== '''Discerning the Effective Geographic Planning Regions for CAPSI''' ====
* What is OTNA’s Industrial Land Value Optimization?
CAPSI Geographic Planning Regions are local, corridor, state/province, regional/multi-state, national, and continental. Initiatives are cataloged here as Potential, In Development, and In Action, as they are conceived and advanced by stakeholder groups.
<big>How do we want transportation planning to evolve in support of sustainable industrial systems?</big>


<big>How can academic and commercial research support sustainable industrial systems?</big>
===== Local =====
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''Potential''</h6></span>
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;">
<li>OnTrackPhiladelphia</li>
</ul>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span>


<big>How do we account for the full impact of industrial systems?</big>
===== Corridor =====
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''Potential''</h6></span>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development'' </h6></span>
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;">
<li>Dallas to Texarkana I30 Corridor Strategy</li>
<li>San Francisco Bay ports to Salt Lake City I80 Corridor Strategy</li>
<li>San Pedro Bay ports to Salt Lake City I15 Corridor</li>
</ul>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span>


<big>What is OTNA’s Land Freight Lifecycle Analysis?</big>
===== State/Province =====
* OnTrackNorthAmerica’s Land Freight Lifecycle Impact Analysis and Calculator reinvent benefit-cost analysis to guide sustainable highway and railway goods movement investments.
{{CollapseState}}
<big>How must interactions among public and private sector entities evolve to support systemwide sustainability?</big>


[[What are the geographic planning regions of CAPSI?|<big>What are the geographic planning regions of CAPSI?</big>]]
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span>
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;">
<li>OnTrackNevada</li>
<li>OnTrackPennsylvania</li>
</ul>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span>


==How must capital deployment evolve to support sustainable industrial systems? <!--former link-->==
===== Regional/Multi-state =====
<big>How do we want investors’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?</big>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''Potential'' </h6></span>
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;">
<li>Southeast Supply Chain Coalition</li>
</ul>


<big>How do we want business stakeholders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?</big>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span>
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;">
<li>Southwest Supply Chain Coalition</li>
</ul>


<big>How do we want lenders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?</big>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span>


<big>How do we want public agencies’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?</big>
===== National =====
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''Potential''</h6></span>
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;">
<li>OnTrackMexico</li>
<li>OnTrackCanada</li>
<li>OnTrackUS</li>
</ul>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span>


<big>What advantages will Sustainable Systems Capitalization deliver?</big>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span>


==[[CAPSI Knowledge Center|What knowledge resources accurately inform CAPSI?]] <!--former link--> ==
===== Continental =====
* OnTrackNorthAmerica

Revision as of 16:07, 31 August 2025

This Is Where The Work Begins!

You have entered the interactive space of Industry Action Plans. When you register as a Participating Stakeholder you can add your concerns and perspectives to one or more Industry Action Plans (IAP).

Industry Action Plans: In Gear, In Development, and Future

In Gear

These are the industries where we see the pressing need for progress and have already gotten a jump start on the work. Our first Industry Action Plan is VitalRail.

In Development

  • RE-CARD, Rail Enabled Cement and Aggregates Regional Distribution
  • RE-POWER, Rail Enabled Power Distribution
  • RE-GLASS, Rail Enabled Glass Logistics and Sustainable Supply
  • FTLUS, Freight Transportation Land Use Strategy
  • RE-BAR, Rail Enabled Brownfield Asset Redevelopment

Future

Do you want to suggest and/or even co-lead CAPSI's work in other industries? Although, our initial focus is on rail's contribution to industrial productivity, CAPSI is designed to improve all industries that can benefit from collaborative progress.

Agriculture
  • Inputs
    • Land
    • Soil
    • Soil Enhancements
    • Water
  • Processing
  • Outputs
    • Food
    • Energy
    • Nutrient material
Forestry
Mining
Manufacturing
  • Metals
  • Chemicals
  • Equipment
  • Textiles
Materials
  • Containers and Packaging
  • Construction Materials
    • Cement and Aggregates
      • RE-CARD, Cement and Aggregates Regional Distribution
    • Refractory
    • Lumber
  • Metals
  • Plastics
  • Paper
Construction
  • Factories
  • Warehouses
  • Powerplants
  • Mechanical and structural components
Energy
  • RE-POWER, Rail Enabled Power Distribution
Transportation
Waste
  • Industrial
  • Commercial
  • Municipal
    • Glass
      • RE-GLASS, Rail Enabled Glass Logistics and Sustainable Supply
  • Construction and demolition waste
  • Agricultural
  • Wood waste
Natural Resources

When deciding how best to streamline an existing industrial system, stakeholders must evaluate all elements within and affected by that system.

  • Water
  • Air
  • Land
    • FTLUS, Freight Transportation Land Use Strategy
    • RE-BAR, Rail Enabled Brownfield Asset Redevelopment

Setting the Design Criteria for CAPSI

  • What do stakeholders want to add to the CAPSI Ethics and Principles?
  • How do you think stakeholders should address CAPSI and Industry Action Plan goals?
  • What Planning Protocols do stakeholders agree on?
  • What Outcomes do stakeholders envision?
  • What outcomes do we want for the environment?
  • What outcomes do we want for citizens?
  • What outcomes do we want for business?
  • What outcomes do we want for investors?
  • What resources does society need and want to optimize?
  • What goods does society need and want to have available?
  • What Measures of progress do stakeholders want to apply?

Reinventing Public-Private Sector Collaboration

  • How do we want planning to support sustainable industrial systems?
  • What benefits do stakeholders want Collaborative Industrial Optimization to deliver?
  • How do we want public-sector economic development to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?
  • How do we want private-sector commercial activity to align with sustainable industrial systems?
  • How do we want land use decisions to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?
  • How do we want transportation planning to evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?
  • How can academic and commercial research support sustainable industrial systems?
  • What factors do we want to include in assessing the full impact of industrial systems?
  • How must interactions among public and private sector entities evolve to support systemwide sustainability?

Reconceiving Capital Deployment

  • How do we want capital deployment to support sustainable industrial systems?
  • How do we want investors’ decisions on capital deployment to evolve?
  • How do we want business stakeholders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
  • How do we want lenders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
  • How do we want public agencies’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
  • What advantages will Sustainable Systems Capitalization deliver?

Discerning the Effective Geographic Planning Regions for CAPSI

CAPSI Geographic Planning Regions are local, corridor, state/province, regional/multi-state, national, and continental. Initiatives are cataloged here as Potential, In Development, and In Action, as they are conceived and advanced by stakeholder groups.

Local
Potential
  • OnTrackPhiladelphia
In Development
In Action
Corridor
Potential
In Development
  • Dallas to Texarkana I30 Corridor Strategy
  • San Francisco Bay ports to Salt Lake City I80 Corridor Strategy
  • San Pedro Bay ports to Salt Lake City I15 Corridor
In Action
State/Province
Potential
Canada-13
Alberta
British Columbia
Manitoba
New Brunswick
Newfoundland and Labrador
Northwest Territories
Nova Scotia
Nunavut
Ontario
Prince Edward Island
Quebec
Saskatchewan
Yukon
United States-50
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Mexico-32
Aguascalientes
Baja California
Baja California Sur
Campeche
Chiapas
Chihuahua
Coahuila
Colima
Durango
Guanajuato
Guerrero
Hidalgo
Jalisco
México
México City
Michoacán
Morelos
Nayarit
Nuevo León
Puebla
Oaxaca
Querétaro
Quintana Roo
San Luis Potosí
Sinaloa
Sonora
Tabasco
Tamaulipas
Tlaxcala
Veracruz
Yucatán
Zacatecas
In Development
  • OnTrackNevada
  • OnTrackPennsylvania
In Action
Regional/Multi-state
Potential
  • Southeast Supply Chain Coalition
In Development
  • Southwest Supply Chain Coalition
In Action
National
Potential
  • OnTrackMexico
  • OnTrackCanada
  • OnTrackUS
In Development
In Action
Continental
  • OnTrackNorthAmerica
Retrieved from "https://capsi.ontracknorthamerica.org/index.php?title=Industry_Action_Plans&oldid=6663"