Initiatives: Difference between revisions

From OnTrackNorthAmerica
No edit summary
(In Action -> In Gear)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


= This Is Where The Work Begins! =
= This Is Where The Work Begins! =
You have entered the interactive space of Industry Action Plans. When you [[Participation Options|register as a Participating Stakeholder]] you can add your concerns and perspectives to one or more Industry Action Plans (IAP).   
You have entered the OTNA Workspace. When you [[Participation Options|register as a Participating Stakeholder]] you can add your concerns and perspectives to one or more of our Initiatives.   
 
==== '''Industry Action Plans: In Gear, In Development, and Future''' ====


== '''In Gear''' ==
== '''In Gear''' ==
These are the industries where we see the pressing need for progress and have already gotten a jump start on the work. Our first Industry Action Plan is VitalRail.
* [[VitalRail|VitalRail, Growing Freight Rail Carloads and Sustainable Industrial Systems]]
* [[VitalRail|VitalRail, a Continental Strategy for Growing Freight Rail Service]]  
* [[RE-FOREST|RE-FOREST, Sustainable Forestry and Wood Products]]
* [[North American Sustainable Forestry Business Plan|RE-FOREST, Sustainable Forestry and Wood Products]]
* [[RE-STEM|RE-STEM, Sustainable Transportation of Essential Minerals]]
* [[RE-STEM Minerals Industry Action Plan|RE-STEM, Sustainable Transportation of Essential Minerals]]


== '''In Development''' ==
== '''In Development''' ==
Line 20: Line 17:


== '''Future''' ==
== '''Future''' ==
Do you want to suggest and/or even co-lead CAPSI's work in other industries? Although, our initial focus is on rail's contribution to industrial productivity, CAPSI is designed to improve all industries that can benefit from collaborative progress.
Do you want to suggest and/or even co-lead OTNA's work in other industries? Although, our initial focus is on rail's contribution to industrial productivity, our initiatives are designed to improve all industries that can benefit from collaborative progress.


===== Agriculture =====
===== Agriculture =====
Line 42: Line 39:
===== Mining =====
===== Mining =====
* Minerals
* Minerals
**[[RE-STEM Industry Action Plan|RE-STEM, Sustainable Transportation of Essential Minerals]]
**[[RE-STEM Minerals Industry Action Plan|RE-STEM, Sustainable Transportation of Essential Minerals]]
* Metals
* Metals
* Coal
* Coal
Line 101: Line 98:
** RE-BAR, Brownfield Asset Redevelopment<!--former link-->
** RE-BAR, Brownfield Asset Redevelopment<!--former link-->


==== '''Setting the Design Criteria for CAPSI''' ====
==== '''Discerning the Effective Geographic Planning Regions for OTNA''' ====
* What do stakeholders want to add to the CAPSI Ethics and Principles?
OTNA Geographic Planning Regions are local, corridor, state/province, regional/multi-state, national, and continental. Initiatives are cataloged here as Potential, In Development, and In Gear, as they are conceived and advanced by stakeholder groups.  
* How do you think stakeholders should address CAPSI and Industry Action Plan goals?
* What Planning Protocols do stakeholders agree on?
* What Outcomes do stakeholders envision?
* What outcomes do we want for the environment?
* What outcomes do we want for citizens?
* What outcomes do we want for business?
* What outcomes do we want for investors?
* What resources does society need and want to optimize?
* What goods does society need and want to have available?
* What Measures of progress do stakeholders want to apply?
 
==== '''Reinventing Public-Private Sector Collaboration''' ====
* How do we want planning to support sustainable industrial systems?
* What benefits do stakeholders want [[Collaborative Industrial Optimization]] to deliver?
* How do we want public-sector economic development to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?
* How do we want private-sector commercial activity to align with sustainable industrial systems?
* How do we want land use decisions to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?
* How do we want transportation planning to evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?
* How can academic and commercial research support sustainable industrial systems?
* What factors do we want to include in assessing the full impact of industrial systems?
* How must interactions among public and private sector entities evolve to support systemwide sustainability?
 
==== '''Reconceiving Capital Deployment''' ====
* How do we want capital deployment to support sustainable industrial systems?
* How do we want investors’ decisions on capital deployment to evolve?
* How do we want business stakeholders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
* How do we want lenders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
* How do we want public agencies’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
* What advantages will Sustainable Systems Capitalization deliver?
 
==== '''Discerning the Effective Geographic Planning Regions for CAPSI''' ====
CAPSI Geographic Planning Regions are local, corridor, state/province, regional/multi-state, national, and continental. Initiatives are cataloged here as Potential, In Development, and In Action, as they are conceived and advanced by stakeholder groups.  


===== Local =====
===== Local =====
Line 142: Line 107:
</ul>
</ul>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Gear''</h6></span>


===== Corridor =====
===== Corridor =====
Line 152: Line 117:
<li>San Pedro Bay ports to Salt Lake City I15 Corridor</li>
<li>San Pedro Bay ports to Salt Lake City I15 Corridor</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Gear''</h6></span>


===== State/Province =====
===== State/Province =====
Line 162: Line 127:
<li>OnTrackPennsylvania</li>
<li>OnTrackPennsylvania</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Gear''</h6></span>


===== Regional/Multi-state =====
===== Regional/Multi-state =====
Line 175: Line 140:
</ul>
</ul>


<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Gear''</h6></span>


===== National =====
===== National =====
Line 186: Line 151:
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span>


<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span>
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Gear''</h6></span>


===== Continental =====
===== Continental =====
* OnTrackNorthAmerica
* OnTrackNorthAmerica

Latest revision as of 20:34, 22 September 2025

This Is Where The Work Begins!

You have entered the OTNA Workspace. When you register as a Participating Stakeholder you can add your concerns and perspectives to one or more of our Initiatives.

In Gear

In Development

  • RE-CARD, Cement and Aggregates Regional Distribution
  • RE-POWER, Rail Enabled Power Distribution
  • RE-GLASS, Glass Logistics and Sustainable Supply
  • FTLUS, Freight Transportation Land Use Strategy
  • RE-BAR, Brownfield Asset Redevelopment

Future

Do you want to suggest and/or even co-lead OTNA's work in other industries? Although, our initial focus is on rail's contribution to industrial productivity, our initiatives are designed to improve all industries that can benefit from collaborative progress.

Agriculture
  • Inputs
    • Land
    • Soil
    • Soil Enhancements
    • Water
  • Processing
  • Outputs
    • Food
    • Energy
    • Nutrient material
Forestry
Mining
Manufacturing
  • Metals
  • Chemicals
  • Equipment
  • Textiles
Materials
  • Containers and Packaging
  • Construction Materials
    • Cement and Aggregates
      • RE-CARD, Cement and Aggregates Regional Distribution
    • Refractory
    • Lumber
  • Metals
  • Plastics
  • Paper
Construction
  • Factories
  • Warehouses
  • Powerplants
  • Mechanical and structural components
Energy
  • RE-POWER, Rail Enabled Power Distribution
Transportation
Waste
  • Industrial
  • Commercial
  • Municipal
    • Glass
      • RE-GLASS, Glass Logistics and Sustainable Supply
  • Construction and demolition waste
  • Agricultural
  • Wood waste
Natural Resources

When deciding how best to streamline an existing industrial system, stakeholders must evaluate all elements within and affected by that system.

  • Water
  • Air
  • Land
    • FTLUS, Freight Transportation Land Use Strategy
    • RE-BAR, Brownfield Asset Redevelopment

Discerning the Effective Geographic Planning Regions for OTNA

OTNA Geographic Planning Regions are local, corridor, state/province, regional/multi-state, national, and continental. Initiatives are cataloged here as Potential, In Development, and In Gear, as they are conceived and advanced by stakeholder groups.

Local
Potential
  • OnTrackPhiladelphia
In Development
In Gear
Corridor
Potential
In Development
  • Dallas to Texarkana I30 Corridor Strategy
  • San Francisco Bay ports to Salt Lake City I80 Corridor Strategy
  • San Pedro Bay ports to Salt Lake City I15 Corridor
In Gear
State/Province
Potential
Canada-13
Alberta
British Columbia
Manitoba
New Brunswick
Newfoundland and Labrador
Northwest Territories
Nova Scotia
Nunavut
Ontario
Prince Edward Island
Quebec
Saskatchewan
Yukon
United States-50
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Mexico-32
Aguascalientes
Baja California
Baja California Sur
Campeche
Chiapas
Chihuahua
Coahuila
Colima
Durango
Guanajuato
Guerrero
Hidalgo
Jalisco
México
México City
Michoacán
Morelos
Nayarit
Nuevo León
Puebla
Oaxaca
Querétaro
Quintana Roo
San Luis Potosí
Sinaloa
Sonora
Tabasco
Tamaulipas
Tlaxcala
Veracruz
Yucatán
Zacatecas
In Development
  • OnTrackNevada
  • OnTrackPennsylvania
In Gear
Regional/Multi-state
Potential
  • Southeast Supply Chain Coalition
In Development
  • Southwest Supply Chain Coalition
In Gear
National
Potential
  • OnTrackMexico
  • OnTrackCanada
  • OnTrackUS
In Development
In Gear
Continental
  • OnTrackNorthAmerica